An independent cite-checker
Every authority is verified against real, official case-law databases before it reaches you. Anything that can't be confirmed is flagged and pulled.
Private beta — a founding cohort of ten is now forming
Ten lawyers' output.
Ten lawyers' output.
One lawyer's judgment — yours.
Orivo reads your entire case file, researches in real Indian and US case law, and puts cited, verified drafts on your desk. Nothing goes out until you sign.
- Every citation verified in real case law
- Your files never train anyone's AI
- No action without your sign-off
Lorven
Calder v. Northgate
in your matter
What are our strongest arguments against their summary judgment motion?
Three hold up against the file:
- Unrebutted expert evidence on the standard of care.
- Conflicting statements placing their engineer on site on 14 March.
- Chen v. Pacific Holdingsverified strengthens the duty-of-care position.
High confidence
Checked: case law · all 12 documents on file · Not checked: opposing expert report (not on file)
Draft the opposition from these three arguments?
Grounded in real case law · Native to Indian & US practice · Built around your sign-off
§ 1The question you're actually asking
Built to never invent a case.
Courts on two continents have sanctioned lawyers for filing briefs with citations that never existed. So the profession's first question about AI is the right one — and it's the question Orivo was engineered around.
You ask
“Can we still file the counter-claim, or is it time-barred?”
Most legal AI
“You're fine — the limitation period runs from the last payment, so you have until next March to file.”
Mehta v. Union of India (2019)
unverifiable
Sounds certain every time — even when the case doesn't exist.
Orivo
“It's close. The period likely runs from the last payment — but one reading of the acknowledgment rule could bar it. Confirm before you rely on this.”
§ 18, Limitation Act
verified
Medium confidence · Checked: statute + 2 rulings · Not checked: your acknowledgment letter
Calibrated — you always know how far to trust it.
It tells you how sure it is
Every answer carries an explicit confidence level. Honest uncertainty, never a confident guess — because the confident wrong answer is the dangerous one.
It shows its working
Each answer lists what was checked and what wasn't — the statute, the rulings, your documents — so you know exactly where its knowledge ends.
§ 2What it actually does
Three things, done properly.
Not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. Orivo holds the whole matter, does the heavy lifting, and watches the calendar — the three jobs that eat a practice alive.
2.1 — The whole file, held
Open a matter. It already knows everything in it.
Documents, parties, key dates, hearings, every prior conversation — one place, fully read. Ask anything about the case and the answer comes from your file, with the source document and page to prove it.
- A case brief that writes and updates itself
- Every fact traceable to its source page
- It remembers — this matter, and how you like to work
Sharma v. Meridian Infra
Active
Case brief auto-generated
Parties
R. Sharma v. Meridian Infra Pvt Ltd · opposing: Desai & Co.
Key facts
Cheque dishonoured 09 Mar; statutory notice served 18 Mar.
Gaps
Reply not drafted · limitation date unconfirmed.
Upcoming
Reply due14 Mar
Next hearing02 Apr
Evidence20 Apr
2.2 — The heavy lifting, done
A team of specialists works every task.
Ask for a brief and Orivo doesn't hand you a wall of text. One specialist researches, one drafts, one reviews, one verifies every citation — in parallel, the way a good chamber works — while you watch it happen live.
- Research grounded in real Indian and US case law
- Drafts in your format, your citation style, your voice
- A reviewer and a cite-checker before it ever reaches you
Researchdone
Draftingworking
Reviewqueued
Citations9 / 14
Opposition to Summary Judgmentevery citation verified · drafted in your format
2.3 — The calendar, watched
It works the file while you're in court.
The moment a document lands, Orivo reads it — and brings you what matters: the deadline that's nine days out, the limitation risk nobody confirmed, the weak authority in opposing counsel's notice. Ranked, with one tap to start the work.
- New documents read the moment they arrive
- Deadlines and limitation risks flagged before they bite
- Any suggestion becomes a running task in one tap
No other legal AI does this. The rest sit idle until you prompt them. Orivo brings you the next move.
reply-notice.pdf uploaded — Orivo read it and flagged 3 things
Reply to the § 138 complaint — 9 days leftCritical
The statutory window closes 14 Mar. No draft exists yet.
Limitation may bar the counter-claimHigh
Cause of action dates to Jan 2023 — confirm before filing.
3 cases in their notice are unverifiedMedium
Run a cite-check on the opposing notice to surface weak authorities.
§ 3How a matter moves
You delegate the work.
You keep the judgment.
Three steps, in plain language, with your approval at the two points that matter. No new process to learn — it works the way you already delegate.
1
Say what you need
“Oppose their summary judgment motion.” That's it — plain language, in the matter. Orivo proposes a plan and waits for your go-ahead.
2
Watch the work happen
Specialists research, draft, review and verify in parallel. Every step is visible live — nothing happens out of sight.
Sign off — or send it back
The finished draft arrives section by section, every citation checked. It files, sends or finalizes only after you approve.
Nothing is filed, sent or finalized without your sign-off. Ever.
§ 4The arithmetic
What moves off your desk —
and what never will.
Engineers had this moment a few years ago: their tools stopped saving minutes and started multiplying people. Orivo is that moment for legal practice.
Moves to Orivo
- First-pass research, cited and verified
- First drafts, in your format and voice
- Citation checking — twice, independently
- Reading every document the day it lands
- Watching deadlines and limitation dates
Stays with you
- The strategy
- The judgment calls
- The client relationship
- The final word on every draft
- The signature
- 4specialists on one task, working in parallel
- 2×every citation checked — drafted, then independently verified
- 24/7the file is watched while you're in court
- 0drafts finalized without your sign-off
Ten times the output. One name on it — yours.
§ 5What this buys you
More matters. Deeper prep.
Your evenings back.
The multiplication is the same everywhere. What it buys you depends on how you practice.
Take the matter you'd have turned away.
A full team's research depth, drafting speed and senior-level review — without payroll. Walk into every hearing with the file fully read and the law checked twice.
Every desk works to your standard.
Shared case intelligence means no associate starts from a blank page — and the firm competes for matters that used to go to bigger names.
Volume grows. Headcount doesn't.
Contract review, research and regulatory answers handled at scale — the business hears back the same day, not next week.
§ 6Confidentiality
Treated like privileged material.
Because it is.
You hold other people's secrets for a living. Orivo is built as if your regulator were reading over our shoulder — in plain terms:
6.1
Your files train no one.
Your matters, documents and conversations are never used to train any model — ours or anyone else's. The data processing agreement puts it in writing.
6.2
Your matters stay yours.
Every matter is isolated at the database level. Your firm's work is never visible to another firm — or to anyone you haven't authorized.
6.3
Everything on the record.
An append-only log records every action — who, what, when. For work you have to stand behind, the trail is already written.
6.4
Encrypted, throughout.
In transit and at rest, end to end. And nothing leaves your firm — no filing, no client email — without your explicit approval.
§ 7The founding ten
Ten seats.
Then the door closes.
Orivo is in private beta, onboarding a hand-picked cohort of attorneys one at a time — white-glove, on a live matter, with the founder. The ask is simple: use it on real work and tell us the truth about it.
- Permanent Founding Member standing
- A direct line to the founder — not a support queue
- Your practice shapes the roadmap
- A permanent favorable pricing tier, whatever we land on
§ 8Questions
The things attorneys ask first.
Does Orivo make up citations?
No. An independent cite-checker verifies every authority against real, official case-law databases before it reaches you, and each answer tells you exactly what was checked. An invented case doesn't survive the gate.
Will it ever act on its own?
Never. No filing, no client communication, no finalized output without your sign-off. Orivo does the work; you make the calls.
What about privilege and client confidentiality?
Orivo is engineered around confidentiality: encryption in transit and at rest, strict isolation between matters and between firms, and an append-only record of every action. Your work product is visible to your firm and no one else, and a data processing agreement binds us in writing.
Is my data used to train AI models?
No — never. Your matters, documents and conversations are not used to train any model, ours or a third party's. Our data processing agreement puts that in writing.
Is it for India or the US?
Both, with native depth in each. For Indian practice: the BNS/BNSS/BSA crosswalk and SCC/AIR citation formatting. For US practice: FRCP and federal procedure. Orivo works in your jurisdiction's framework by default.
What does it cost?
Founding members aren't quoted a price — they lock a permanent favorable tier whenever pricing is set. The ask is simple: use Orivo on a live matter and tell us the truth about it.
Your practice, multiplied.
Your judgment, in command.
Research, drafting and case intelligence in one colleague — without giving up an ounce of control.